As a resident of Dallas, and a big Mavs fan, the NBA finals were quite a dissapointment. The Mavs lost a series there is no way they should have lost. Some of the key reasons for the loss:
1. Extremely poor officiating. This cost the Mavs Game 5, and possibly Game 6. The NBA has unofficial rules that so called “superstars” get special treatment from the refs. This was true with Michael Jordon, and became very true with Dwaye Wade, Miami’s best player.
2. Key shots made by unexpected players. Gary Payton scored only a few baskets in the entire series, yet won Game 3 on a last second shot, and had a huge bucket late in Game 5. In Game 6, Posey had not made a shot, yet hit a 3-pointer with about 1 minute left, just after Jerry Stackhouse had missed a 3-pointer for Dallas…this was a 6 point turnaround.
3. Shaq hits 2 free throws, and Dirk misses one…who would have thought? Shaq is a 50% free-thrower and Dirk is a 90% shooter.
4. Devin Harris plays extremely poorly on offense. Coach Avery Johnson is hesitent to replace him with Marquis Daniels, and when he finally does (in the last game of the series), Daniels scores 12 points in the last half of the last game, providing a big spark to the Mavs. Why stick with a player that is performing so poorly.
How does this all relate to investing? In two ways. The first is overconfidence. The city of Dallas, and almost all NBA experts expected a Dallas victory. It turns out this was not the case! As an investor, even though you are fully confident in your investment choices, things may go wrong. All investment “experts” can and will be wrong at some point (including me, of course).
The second is unexpected events happen. Even though a sequence of events is unlikely to happen, if the probability is greater than 0, sometimes they do happen. The sequence of events that led to Dallas loss, poor officiating, big shots from unexpected sources, a terrible free-thrower hitting, while a good one misses, and a refusal to change substitution patterns all combined to lead to an unexpected result. Keep in mind that unexpected things will happen to the companies you invest in. The best way to handle this is to be prepared. Try and envision various outcomes, even if those are not favorable to your investment position.
There is probably some lesson in cutting your losses (Harris), and trying a new strategy (Daniels), but that would really more apply to an investment choice that is running up against a timeframe deadline. Not really for the long term investor. I’d expect Harris to play better next year (long term), but that was not relevant to a time-bound series (short term).